Welcome to Veteran's of Modern Warfare! We're Glad You're Here!!
- HVAC-Dems Expand Education Opportunity Beyond What Administration Proposed Representative Mike Michaud (ME-02), Ranking Member of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, applauded the efforts of two Democratic committee members for introducing legislation that will extend the Veterans Rehabilitation Assistance Program (VRAP) for six months, and allows more veterans to take advantage… Read More
- The War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC) is a National VA Post-Deployment Health Resource. The WRIISC’s focus on the post deployment health concerns of Veterans and their unique health care needs. The WRIISCs develop and provide post-deployment health expertise to Veterans and their health care providers through clinical… Read More
- Kathy Marschman - Our New President Read More
- VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 – GI Bill for Unemployed Veterans Age 35-60 If you are an unemployed military veteran, you may be eligible for a new GI Bill / career training program: the VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011 was created to help veterans gain marketable skills to… Read More
- VA Accidentally Releases Vets' Personal Info January 21, 2012 Stars and Stripes|by Leo Shane III WASHINGTON -- More than 2,200 veterans had their personal information accidentally posted on the genealogy website Ancestry.com last year, a move that could potentially expose them to identify theft crimes. Officials from the Department of Veterans… Read More
- Veteran’s Disability Benefits Under Attack Again! by Jere Beery Courtesy of Veterans Today New garnishment policy enacted by the US Department of Treasury. Below is the explanation of the new policy enacted by the US Department of the Treasury. This legislation misses the mark on current federal garnishment protection under… Read More
- Please download and hand out our newsletters! February 2011 July 2011 November 2011 Don't have a Facebook account? Join now by clicking http://www.facebook.com Already have a Facebook account? Join VMW's Facebook page now by clicking HERE Share Read More
- Veterans Day Honors Service, Sacrifice By Jim Garamone American Forces Press Service WASHINGTON, Nov. 9, 2011 – Until the 1960s, veterans groups used the red poppy as the symbol of Veterans Day. In Great Britain, it still is. The symbol comes from a poem, “In Flanders Fields,” written by Canadian doctor… Read More
- August 31, 2011 Courtesy of VA.gov Over $2.2 Billion in Retroactive Agent Orange Benefits Paid to 89,000 Vietnam Veterans and Survivors for Presumptive Conditions WASHINGTON – Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki announced today that more than $2.2 billion in retroactive benefits has already been paid to approximately 89,000 Vietnam… Read More
- Disability Payments to Former Spouse? Sgt. Shaft | August 09, 2011 Courtesy of Military.com Dear Sgt Shaft: I am in the middle of a divorce after 18 years of marriage. I receive service-connected disability from the VA from when I was in the Army. My wife and I were not married… Read More
Veteran’s Disability Benefits Under Attack Again!
New garnishment policy enacted by the US Department of Treasury. Below is the explanation of the new policy enacted by the US Department of the Treasury. This legislation misses the mark on current federal garnishment protection under USC Title 42 §659.(h)(1)(B)(iii) for disabled veterans in receipt of disability compensation.
This language also contradicts the current language and protection under USC Title 38 §5301, which stipulate that any money traceable to VA disability is not considered property, nor subject to attachment, seizure, garnishment, levy under any legal process whatsoever. When civil courts garnish veterans’ disability under the premise of this new policy, it can be construed as double jeopardy, since federal laws already protect all benefit moneys against any garnishment order. The Department of Treasury would no legislative authority under the current federal statutes to garnish any veterans’ disability compensation, nor can it extend this fraudulent authority to the banks. To do so would constitute a violation of the federal laws that prohibit such legal process.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury recently enacted a new regulation that requires banks to protect federal benefits from being garnished. Before these protections were in place, exempting federal benefit payments from being garnished was hit or miss depending on your showing up in court or proving that the funds in your account were exempt. Here is what you need to know:
The new policy became effective May 1, 2011, and requires banks to review accounts when they receive a garnishment order. If the account contains federal benefits from any of the following sources, then the bank must protect those funds:
- Social Security,
- Supplemental Security Income,
- Veterans Affairs, Railroad Retirement,
- Railroad Unemployment Insurance
- Civil Service Retirement System and Benefits from the Office of Personnel Management or
Federal Employees Retirement System.
Well, at least a portion of them. In order for the federal benefits to qualify for protection, they must be directly deposited into the bank account. Federal benefit deposits made by check do not qualify for protection.
The protected amount would be based only on the federal benefit deposits identified in the previous two months immediately preceding the garnishment order. The bank is required to review the accounts of the person named in the garnishment order within two days after receipt of an order. For example, if during the look-back period the bank identifies two federal benefit deposits of $1,000 each, they are required to protect $2,000 of funds in the account.
The bank is required to review all accounts for the person named in the garnishment order, but is only required to protect funds in the account(s) where the federal benefits are direct deposited. So, if you move money from your checking account (where your VA benefit is direct deposited) into your saving account, the funds in your saving account are not protected from garnishment.
Any funds in the account in excess of the protected amount established during the two-month period preceding the garnishment order are not protected and are eligible for garnishment per the order received by the bank.
If the garnishment is to pay delinquent child support or a federal debt, then the above rules do not apply and all the funds are subject to the court order or IRS levy.
So, if your bank receives a garnishment order for you and your Veterans Affairs benefits are directly deposited, they should be protected. But, any money in the account in excess of two months of VA deposits or any money in other accounts at that bank would be fair game for the credit card company.
This new policy punishes veterans by seizing their disability compensation by attempting to redefine the garnishment protection under USC Title 42 §659 and USC Title 38 §5301. There are no special conditions on such garnishment for it protects any and all disability compensation disbursed by the Department of veterans Affairs. This language under this new law attempts to undermine the original intention of Congress under USC Title 38 §5301. It would not make sense for the federal government to implement laws that contradict other federal laws in such protection, consequently subjecting them to ambiguity in its interpretation.
It is hard to imagine that the other Veterans Service Organizations failed to understand the implications of this new law in its entirety, since, it does presents questions on whether current laws will supersede the existing federal statutes under USC Title 42 §659 and USC Title 38 §5301.
If you are a disabled veteran receiving service-connected disability compensation, you would be well advised to take your money out of the bank and bury it in a can in your backyard.
Contributing to this article;
Simon Alvarado, MSW
Operation Firing For Effect